Dandy Lyon
9:42 Sat May 1
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Amazing how his colour came into the conversation from the off.
If found guilty then he deserves everything coming to him, including losing his career.
Of course is the sheer amount of people calling him a wrongun is a measure of guilt, the Come On You Irons should have been locked up ages ago.
|
peroni
8:52 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Another needless witch hunt.
|
,
8:39 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
To be clear these women who came forward accused Clarke of harassment and bullying.
Clarke has come out and has vehemently denied any sexual misconduct or criminal behaviour.
Clarke also has said that it is clear to him that some of his actions affected people in ways he did not intend or realise. He says that he is deeply sorry and will seek professional help to educate himself and change for the better.
|
Alfs
8:21 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Ah, so THAT'S what happened to Bill Cosby.
|
goose
8:18 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
An actress friend of Noel Clarke told MailOnline earlier today that the 20 women accusing him of being a 'sexual predator' are pursuing a racist 'witchhunt' as the actor was sacked by Sky, suspended by Bafta and criticised by a co-star who backed his alleged victims.
The actress, who asked not to be named, said the 45-year-old actor, writer and director's fall from grace is because 'no one likes it when a man of colour gets to the top'.
There you go, that didn’t take long.
|
Alfs
8:11 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Penners
I used to see John Lesley around a lot in Soho House. His nickname amongst the staff was 'Handsy'. Always pissed. Arrogant fucker, too.
|
Nurse Ratched
8:08 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Actually charging and trying alleged offenders, putting the evidence to a jury and all that caper, is laughably 20th century. Surely our modern method of deciding guilt via Twitbook is more sophisticated and humane?
|
eastend joker
7:46 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
i have yet to hear he has been charged by the Police yet or have i missed this ?
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
7:31 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
No. I analysed it line by line. I didn't spin it. There is no other interpretation that makes sense.
Of course, I remain a massive bender, and am happy to bum you again whenever you want. Thanks for asking.
|
Nagel
7:18 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Surface, what he said and what he meant was clear and already explained to you. The "logic" of your "workings" was just to analyse it line by line, out of context to spin the meaning. It's a really snide way of doing things. Anyone can do that. Let's take apart your last sentence.
"An absolute arse"
"dripping"
"camp"
Your choice of words here clearly indicates that you're a massive bender.
|
Bishopsfinger
7:07 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Innocent until proven guilty. If he’s guilty then he’s a sex pest.
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
7:07 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Just show me where my logic is wrong.
The 'OR' makes no difference. That's just his own bigoted way of presupposing there are only two alternative reactions that people he doesn't like might have.
An absolute arse of a post, dripping with self-righteousness, self-advertisement and supposed moral superiority. Your supporting it so avidly puts you in the same camp, I'm afraid.
|
Nagel
7:02 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
"English not you first language?"
Oh, the irony.
You're embarrassing yourself more and more with every post. I'd give up now if I were you.
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
6:55 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Nagel 6:44 Fri Apr 30
'He even capitalised the OR to emphasise that he thought bigots would need to choose one or the other.'
Yes he did post that. How does that contradict my logic?
'You tell me where in that sentence it says he thinks it's OK for a black man to be a sex pest.'
You tell me where I said he did say it's OK for a black man to be a sex pest. He said (by extrapolation) it's not OK to kick a black man for being a sex pest. He didn't say it's OK for a black man to be a sex pest. English not you first language?
|
Leonard Hatred
6:55 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Lee Trundle wrote...
Re: Noel Clarke.
I mean, it's probably obvious he's a bit of a wrong 'un with the amount of women coming forward, but what happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Could say the same about Jimmy Savile.
|
Serious Drinking
6:44 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Episode 1-4 are still on the ITV hub, maybe they are just virtue signalling by taking it off at its scheduled time but it can be seen online at least
|
Skooby
6:44 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Lee Trundle wrote...
Re: Noel Clarke.
I mean, it's probably obvious he's a bit of a wrong 'un with the amount of women coming forward, but what happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Doesn't matter these days. His Bafta was stripped before he's had a chance to respond. Crazy...
But yeah - he probably is a wrong 'un
|
Nagel
6:44 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Surface, I assumed that you're the sort who likes to quote things out of context to suit your agenda, rather than just being a bit thick. Seeing as you think you were actually being logical I suggest you read it through again, engaging your brain this time.
"The reason I headed over here was to see how the bitter old bigots on here would face this - put the boot in on the black man OR defend men's rights to letch all over women?"
He even capitalised the OR to emphasise that he thought bigots would need to choose one or the other. You tell me where in that sentence it says he thinks it's OK for a black man to be a sex pest. No, didn't think you could.
|
Lee Trundle
6:10 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
I mean, it's probably obvious he's a bit of a wrong 'un with the amount of women coming forward, but what happened to innocent until proven guilty?
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
5:40 Fri Apr 30
Re: Noel Clarke.
|
Nagel 1:37 Fri Apr 30
'"a sex pest should have the boot put in on him, but not if he's black"
He's clearly not saying that though, is he?'
He's saying exactly that. That's why I showed my workings. Perhaps you'd like to point out the flaw in my logic.
|
| 
